Wednesday, April 29, 2026

Old Journalism Is Coming in Shiny New Wrappers

If you know what is going on in Gaza, it is because a journalist told you.

If you know Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s latest comment about autism, it is because a journalist told you.

If you know that there was a tsunami off the coast of Indonesia, it is because a journalist told you.

If you know that Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce are planning to marry, it is because a journalist told you — in print, over the air or on the web.

Yet when “the media” is discussed, you would think that what is essential isn’t journalism, but rather the means of delivery. The death of newspapers is high on the woeful list.

I am a newspaperman through and through. Although I have been involved, often simultaneously, with broadcasting, my heart and soul are in newspapers.

I first set foot in a newsroom when I was 14 — and I left part of me there.

I learned a lot about hot type in my youth, and I love the mechanics of newspapers. At The Washington Post, where I had a roving assignment, I often worked on “the stone,” where the type was put in the pages by artisans of extraordinary skill.

But that has gone. Hot type is history. If you want to savor it, tour the Museum of Printing in Haverhill, Massachusetts.

Sadly, I must confess that no printed newspaper is delivered to my home every day. I subscribe to the digital versions of four newspapers, four magazines and several online-only outlets, and I suffer jabs of guilt when I sit before a computer screen.

Nearly all major newspapers and many smaller ones have online editions. The largest ones are grabbing much of the subscription money.

That is a repeat of what happened in big cities toward the end of the golden days of words printed on paper: The winners took all.

The New York Times drove out the Herald Tribune. The Washington Post drove out The Washington Star and The Washington Daily News.

In the case of printed newspapers, those with just a slightly larger circulation corralled all the advertising. Today’s chances are that those with a greater offering will drive out those with a robust offering, but not as dominant as, say, The Times.

Big newspapers have adopted the paywall as the model for the future, and others have had to follow. It will be a pity if that prevails.

A better model would be a pay-to-read arrangement where you join a collective such as Visa or MasterCard and pay for what you want to read. That would provide a stable future for journalism and enable much of the innovation that is going on to be on a sound financial footing.

There is innovation aplenty in how the precious commodity, journalism, is brought to you.

The magazines have morphed into something more: They have become daily newspapers with their emailed editions. The New Yorker, The Economist, The Atlantic and The Spectator have taken this path, among others. Even Vanity Fair has an emailed edition.

Additionally, British newspapers have invaded the United States with some spritely email offerings. The Daily Mirror, The Independent, The Guardian and The Daily Mail are among them.

Then there are many new entries of purely internet vintage. These include but aren’t limited to the leaders, Axios and Semafor — although Axios, with revenues of over $100 million, is the clear winner to date.

This suggests that journalism is alive and well and that its future is online, but its revenue stream isn’t certain. One hopes that the winner-takes-all history won’t repeat itself and that a vibrant new order of journalism, tempting to talent, grows in importance. After all, at one time big cities had many newspapers; New York had more than 20 daily newspapers.

The threshold of entry for internet publishing is low. A pay-per-view rather than a paywall would establish a new golden era in which skill and talent would carry the day and where the right content would propel its authors and the publications to success.

As to my world of great presses, raging like livid monsters in the middle of night, well, there will be some for a long time. But the new carriers of that critical commodity known as journalism will carry the day.

This column first appeared in White House Chronicle.

Author profile
Llewellyn King

Llewellyn King is executive producer and host of "White House Chronicle" on PBS.

- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest news

Borrowed Growth: Nepal’s Loan Dependency and the Economic Shock It May Not Survive

NEW DELHI - Nepal's total external debt has grown steadily in recent years, reaching approximately $10 billion by 2024,...

Perception, Politics, and Security: The West Bengal Question

WASHINGTON - “I have come here to meet the Honorable Chief Minister. To have met her is a dream...

PLA Navy Day Spectacle Masks War Reality: Drills Push Taiwan Toward a 2027 Flashpoint

NEW DELHI - China's annual PLA Navy Day is no longer just ceremonial pageantry. It is rapidly evolving into...

Gwadar at a Breaking Point: Trade Ambitions Meet a New Maritime Threat

NEW DELHI - It is rare for a port to dominate security briefings more than trade reports. For Gwadar,...
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Washington Update | Ethiopia at a Crossroads: Democracy, Human Rights, and the Silencing of Voices

WASHINGTON - Today, the Ethiopian people continue to face a profoundly difficult political reality. Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed repeatedly...

Chernobyl at 40: Secret Stasi Files Reveal Extent of Soviet Misinformation Campaign Over Nuclear Disaster

Lauren Cassidy, Binghamton University, State University of New York On April 26, 1986, Soviet engineers at the Chernobyl nuclear power...

Must read

Perception, Politics, and Security: The West Bengal Question

WASHINGTON - “I have come here to meet the...

Welcome to the ‘Gray Zone’ − Home to Nefarious International Acts that Fall Short of Outright Conflict

Andrew Latham, Macalester College Hostile acts don’t always arrive with...