Tuesday, April 21, 2026

Exxon Had the Right Global Warming Numbers Despite Decades of Denial: Study

A first-ever systematic assessment of an oil and gas company’s climate projections shows that Exxon scientists accurately predicted how fossil fuels would affect global temperatures, despite decades of PR activity meant to sow doubt and climate denial.

The analysis “allows us, for the first time, to put a number on what #ExxonKnew: that burning coal, oil, and gas was going to heat the planet by 0.20° ± 0.04°C every decade. And they were right on the money,” tweeted lead author Geoffrey Supran, professor of environmental science and policy at the University of Miami.

The study builds on discoveries by investigative journalists at Inside Climate News in 2015, which revealed internal company memos indicating that Exxon understood the risks of climate change from burning fossil fuels as early as 1970. While those investigations focused on the text of the documents, no prior study had systematically reviewed the numerical and graphical information in the climate modeling projections.

To determine the accuracy of Exxon’s predictions, the researchers reviewed all known climate change projections—including 32 internal documents and 72 peer-reviewed publications—produced by company scientists for Exxon and, following a 1999 merger, for ExxonMobil. Then they compared the projections with academic and government research and observed temperature measurements for those years.

The new findings show that the company’s predictions reasonably align with both—63% to 83% of the Exxon scientists’ climate projections accurately predicted subsequent global warming of 0.20°C ± 0.04°C (about 0.2°C) per decade. So that the companies’ projections were “within uncertainty, the same as that of independent academic and government projections published between 1970 and 2007.”

The Exxon scientists also accurately predicted that human-caused global warming would first be detectable within five years of 2000, and reasonably estimated how much carbon dioxide would lead to dangerous warming.

William D. Collins, who leads the Climate & Ecosystem Sciences Division at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and was not involved in the study, described the analysis as “very sound,” reports the New York Times.

The study will have important implications for ongoing lawsuits intended to hold fossil fuel companies legally accountable for their role in the climate crisis.

The researchers also compared the Exxon research to company PR at the time. Despite the company’s data confirming the potential for human-caused global warming, its public statements talked down climate models’ reliability and emphasized the uncertainty of scientific conclusions.

In late 2021, during a U.S. House subcommittee hearing about whether oil companies misled the public, Exxon CEO Darren Woods said the company’s positions released over the years were “entirely consistent” with the scientific consensus of the time, the Times writes.

Woods’ claim does not align with the findings presented in the new study.

“We now have airtight, statistically rigorous evidence that Exxon accurately predicted global warming years before it turned around and publicly attacked climate science and scientists,” Supran tweeted. “In that sense, this graph doesn’t just communicate a crisis, it confirms complicity.”

An ExxonMobil spokesperson responded that “this issue has come up several times in recent years and, in each case, our answer is the same: those who talk about how “Exxon Knew” are wrong in their conclusions.”

This article first appeared in The Energy Mix.

Author profile
The Energy Mix
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

Latest news

India’s Silent Gurukul Revolution

A decade ago, I met super bright, energetic kids at a Gurukul in Gujarat. Watching them in dhotis doing...

Washington Update: Human Rights Crisis in Ethiopia Matters for Peace and Stability

Why the Human Rights Crisis in Ethiopia Matters for Peace and Stability Conferences Kennedy Caucus Room – U.S. Senate Russell Office...

Sovereignty Slaughter: Is the U.S.-Bangladesh Trade Deal a “Puppet” Pact?

NEW DELHI - The February 2026 U.S.-Bangladesh Agreement on Reciprocal Trade appears less like a traditional trade pact and...

The Systematic Erasure of Tiananmen Square: How China Deletes History

NEW DELHI - The violent suppression of student-led protests in Tiananmen Square in 1989 remains one of the most...
- Advertisement -spot_img
- Advertisement -spot_img

The Paradox of Tarique Rahman and his Banning of the Awami League

WASHINGTON - With a past marred by allegations of crime and controversy, many had expected that, after 17 years...

Washington Update: Congressional Briefing on Ethiopia’s Human Rights Crisis

Human Rights Crisis in Ethiopia – Conference and Congressional Briefing Kennedy Caucus Room We would like to express our sincere gratitude...

Must read

How Labeling Uyghurs a “Minority” Enables China’s Denial of East Turkistani Self-Determination

Since 2017, governments, media outlets, and international institutions have...

Winds of Change by Asanga Abeyagoonasekera Launched in Sri Lanka

COLOMBO —  A large audience gathered at Alliance Française...